Comments on: WebOrb for .Net – Only viable Flex remoting solution for ASP.Net? http://themindfulcoder.com/2009/05/weborb-for-net-only-viable-remoting-solution-for-aspnet/ Code, yes. But think about it a little first. Sat, 18 Jun 2011 21:21:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: galtroarc http://themindfulcoder.com/2009/05/weborb-for-net-only-viable-remoting-solution-for-aspnet/comment-page-1/#comment-30 galtroarc Thu, 14 May 2009 15:40:00 +0000 http://themindfulcoder.com/2009/05/weborb-for-net-only-viable-remoting-solution-for-aspnet/#comment-30 Justin, you have summarized the comparison pretty well in that post. I did look at Fluorinefx but came away with the impression that it was not as intuitive to use as WebOrb and also while as you point out both products could do with better documentation, WebOrb seemed to have better documentation of the two and looked it was easier to adopt quickly. Also there seem to be more forums and developer blogs dealing with WebOrb than with Fuorinefx for now. This will prove important for practical purposes since given the limited documentation, the dev team will will be googling a lot. nnIt would be very interesting to see how both products develop in the future.nThanksa lot for the input! :) Justin, you have summarized the comparison pretty well in that post. I did look at Fluorinefx but came away with the impression that it was not as intuitive to use as WebOrb and also while as you point out both products could do with better documentation, WebOrb seemed to have better documentation of the two and looked it was easier to adopt quickly. Also there seem to be more forums and developer blogs dealing with WebOrb than with Fuorinefx for now. This will prove important for practical purposes since given the limited documentation, the dev team will will be googling a lot. nnIt would be very interesting to see how both products develop in the future.nThanksa lot for the input! :)

]]> By: galtroarc http://themindfulcoder.com/2009/05/weborb-for-net-only-viable-remoting-solution-for-aspnet/comment-page-1/#comment-14 galtroarc Thu, 14 May 2009 13:40:16 +0000 http://themindfulcoder.com/2009/05/weborb-for-net-only-viable-remoting-solution-for-aspnet/#comment-14 Justin, you have summarized the comparison pretty well in that post. I did look at Fluorinefx but came away with the impression that while it was not as intuitive to use as WebOrb and also while as you point out both products could do with better documentation, WebOrb seemed to have better documentation and looked it was easier to adopt quickly. Also there seem to be more forums and developer blogs dealing with WebOrb than with Fuorinefx for now. This will prove important for practical purposes since given the limited documentation, the dev team will will be googling a lot. <br><br>It would be very interesting to see how both products develop in the future.<br>Thanksa lot for the input! :) Justin, you have summarized the comparison pretty well in that post. I did look at Fluorinefx but came away with the impression that while it was not as intuitive to use as WebOrb and also while as you point out both products could do with better documentation, WebOrb seemed to have better documentation and looked it was easier to adopt quickly. Also there seem to be more forums and developer blogs dealing with WebOrb than with Fuorinefx for now. This will prove important for practical purposes since given the limited documentation, the dev team will will be googling a lot.

It would be very interesting to see how both products develop in the future.
Thanksa lot for the input! :)

]]> By: Justin J. Moses http://themindfulcoder.com/2009/05/weborb-for-net-only-viable-remoting-solution-for-aspnet/comment-page-1/#comment-13 Justin J. Moses Tue, 12 May 2009 21:14:57 +0000 http://themindfulcoder.com/2009/05/weborb-for-net-only-viable-remoting-solution-for-aspnet/#comment-13 There is also FluorineFx (<a href="http://fluorinefx.com/" rel="nofollow">http://fluorinefx.com/</a>) which is Open Source flash remoting for .NET. Not nearly as feature full as WebORB, but an alternative none the less. Also, the open source aspect allows you to learn exactly what goes on under the hood - and tweak it if need be.<br><br>Personally, I use WebORB these days - which is an incredible product. Nevertheless, I keep my eye on FluorineFx and compare it every new release or so. <br><br><a href="http://justinjmoses.wordpress.com/2008/03/10/weborb-vs-fluorinefx/" rel="nofollow">http://justinjmoses.wordpress.com/2008/03/10/we...</a> There is also FluorineFx (http://fluorinefx.com/) which is Open Source flash remoting for .NET. Not nearly as feature full as WebORB, but an alternative none the less. Also, the open source aspect allows you to learn exactly what goes on under the hood – and tweak it if need be.

Personally, I use WebORB these days – which is an incredible product. Nevertheless, I keep my eye on FluorineFx and compare it every new release or so.

http://justinjmoses.wordpress.com/2008/03/10/we…

]]>